Posted by
Ron on Thursday, August 24, 2006 4:50:50 PM
I have four wonderful children: Mallory (17), Zach (16),
Reagan (13), and Blake (15).
Of course I’m biased, but they are all wonderful, respectful
kids with great hearts and wonderful outlooks on life. They are fearfully and
wonderfully made, and they are all blessings from the Lord that I really don’t
deserve. My wife Lisa does, but I don’t.
Though all have had their share of accidents, Blake seems to
be the one most prone to hurting himself. His soccer coach immediately named
him “Crash” because of his style of play. He loves skating, and his arms and
legs are frequently covered with bruises, scrapes, and cuts. At a rainy out
door Little League baseball cookout, Blake was swinging on his elbows between
two picnic tables in a pavilion with a concrete floor. There isn’t much give in
those kinds of floors. There was a lot of humidity in the air, and things were
slippery. I saw him swinging out of the corner of my eye, while talking to
someone. While I didn’t think that was the best idea in the world, I figured he
knew what he was doing and didn’t go over to say anything to him. As he gained
momentum, sure enough, up his legs went, and out his arms went, and down his
head went. He hit the concrete with the back of his head. Hard. Off to the
emergency room we went. He went to an ice skating party, and we had to take him
to the emergency room with two very loose and damaged front teeth, and a cut
lip requiring stitches. You see the pattern here. He has applied for an
emergency room frequent-flyer card. At his 13th birthday party,
someone was saying nice things about Blake and what a wonderful kid he is. My
response was something to the effect of “thanks, but hey we’re just glad he’s
made it this far.”
As I see frequent news reports of studies that shows health
related issues, or see a pharmaceutical company (I’m normally a fan of their
work) showing a commercial about another potential disease that sends people
running to their doctor in fear, or hear of this potential health problem or
that one, I often lament to my wife that with all the potential and seemingly
serious everyday threats to our health, I’m surprised the human race has made
it this far. The last time I checked, our population
was still rapidly expanding, so much so that overpopulation advocates are
already raising alarms that at current trends we will render the world
unable to support its human population. So here is a recent example of what I’m
talking about.
Over at Scientific
American.com, there’s an article
discussing the dangers to one’s health of being overweight. Don’t we already
know that? Wouldn’t a reasonably intelligent person understand that obesity is
inherently unhealthy the same way one would presume smoking would be? This
article states that it’s unhealthier for women to be even a few pounds
overweight rather than men. But the line I found most disturbing was this: “…the
federally funded National Health and
Nutrition Examination Survey did not find in a 2005 study that being a little
overweight or underweight increased health risks (italics mine).” We need
federal money to pay for a survey to tell us that? Who decided we needed that?
To what purpose? More nanny-state public service ads advising us to eat right? Legislation
prohibiting obesity? Maybe such legislation would allow people to trade obesity
“credits” like they’re trying to do in CA with industrial emissions in an
effort to reduce global warming, which isn’t even proven to be caused my
manmade sources. One person could choose to be overweight as long as they paid
somebody else to be under or normal weight.
And here’s the closing paragraph:
"This finding is a sobering reminder that because
obesity is now a worldwide problem (with
the exception, I presume, of poverty and famine affected third world countries,
which are seeing the most population growth – auth.), the phenomenon of
'global fattening' will contribute to a pandemic of chronic diseases for many
years to come," said Timothy Byers of the University of Colorado School of
Medicine, in a journal commentary.
This is hysterical codespeak for “you better give me more of
your tax dollars so I can study this problem further, determine that the
problem still exists, and ask for even more of your money, thereby sustaining
myself to the lifestyle to which I’ve grown accustomed, while staying away from
that dreadful and nasty private marketplace where I might have to compete for
my living.” Please.
So here we have the federal government, using your tax
dollars and mine, to study something anyone with common sense would already
know. It just drives me nuts. Maybe I should call my congresswoman to ask her
to sponsor a study to see how federal wastage on studies like this affects
people like me. It would probably prove just as useful, which is to say not at
all.