About Me

Name: Ron
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Why I Belive What I Believe

I was born and raised into a Baptist home, to two wonderful parents and an older brother and sister. I’ll write more on them later. I was raised being taught that there is a God, one God, the creator of our world and universe and of all things, and that a person’s inevitable sin will cause separation from God and that God sent His Son, in the person of Jesus Christ, to bridge that gap. That if a person believed that Christ is the Son of God, died on the cross on behalf of our sins, and was resurrected and taken up to heaven, that that person’s relationship with God was restored, and that his or her spiritual death was defeated, and that upon his or her earthly death their soul would be taken to heaven as well. I was taught that God loves us, wants the best for us, and that if we follow Him and live a life in pursuit of Him He will take care of us. We are not promised a trouble-free life, but that He will ultimately take care of us.

I took the step of professing my faith when I was seven years old, when I guess I felt like I was sufficiently intellectually aware to be able to grasp this concept in a way that made my faith, and profession of faith, real and sincere. The memory of that night (or at least my version of it) is still vivid in my mind. We were living in the Dominican Republic at the time, and the family was gathered around the dinner table, holding hands, as I prayed my prayer of acknowledgment of my faith and accepted Christ as my Savior and Lord of my life. I think my parents were crying, I know I certainly was, as they watched and listened to their youngest son take the steps that would seal the destiny of his soul. If they felt anything like I did when each of my children took this step, then they must have been crying. It’s not something a believing parent sees and not be overcome with emotion.

As I’ve lived my life (I’m 47 now) and my intellectual capacity has grown (though many of my friends would persuasively argue that my intellectual capacity barely exists at all), I at times have wondered what I would believe had I been born into a household that practiced a different faith or maybe not at all. Would I arrive at the same conclusions? Would I embrace or scoff at the notion of a virgin birth? I mean, depending on how one looks at it, the whole thing is pretty fantastic. I mean, there are a lot of things to believe in that run counter to everything tangible; that can be seen and touched. This must be why Paul writes in his beautiful letter to Romans, in the most beautiful chapter of the letter, Romans 8. Verse 24 states “For in hope we have been saved, but hope that is seen is not hope (faith); for why does one also hope for what he sees?”

Over the years I have met many believers who grew up believing one thing or nothing at all, and who eventually came to know the Lord, and in the process gave up family connections and friendships. They gave up thought processes to which they’d held firm their entire lives, to which they once clung to as a basis for living. It must have been a tremendous effort of will to make such a change; to place one’s faith for living in a completely different avenue.

The other aspect of the story of God’s love is the sheer wonder of it all. How can these things be? What do you mean, there’s a creator of all things but that will still listen to my prayers? He gave up his only Son whom He loved for me? Are you kidding? You expect me to believe that? How am I worth that? To quote a song by a Christian artist, “There must be some mistake, because I’m not worth the price you paid.” How can a sinful person like myself still have worth in the eyes of the Creator of all living things? How can He, who is perfect and whose glory is too pure for us to see, also be so patient with all my behaviors, and forgive me again and again and again?  What?

Ultimately, when I ponder these things, and little seeds of wonder (more harshly put, doubt) creep into my mind, I fall back on this belief. This world is not an accident. This creation is not a creation of chance. Think of the odds. Think of the beauty of nature, the sunsets, the spring blossoms, and the fall colors, the sunrises, the breathtaking beauty of rocky, snow-covered peaks, the sound of waves washing up on warm, balmy beaches, the feeling of breezes (where do they start and end?) going through your hair. Think of the human body, the miracle that it is. Think of the miracle of eyesight, of the brain, of the ability to hear, reason, choose, process information, speak, run, walk, feel, and smell. Think of the miracle of the womb, the place where life begins. There is almost too much to ponder.

Someone created this. To believe (and it is, in fact, a belief) that all of this world, our universe and the never-ending space (that alone is almost too much to ponder, where does space end?) that surrounds our universe, and the stars that are light-years away, and the miracles I described above is all an accident, an occurrence of pure chance, that all land mammals somehow derive from some slug living in the ocean decided he wanted to see what it felt like to be dry, to believe all that takes far more faith than it does for me to believe that God exists, that we are created for His purposes, that He designed all things for a specific purpose, and that He designed nature in its wonderful balance, and that He sent His son to atone for our sins. I place my faith in the Lord because He called me, and because I believe His Word, but also because, in its most base form, my faith is that there’s no way all of this just happened.

So that’s why I choose to believe what I believe. He gave us His Word in the form of the Bible and in His Son, and I believe it. Though my behavior would frequently give one the cause for doubt, I do my best to live my life by it. I choose to pursue the excellence in life that the Bible describes. I do my best to live in His will. It’s a great way to try to live.

Ultimately, everyone chooses to put his or her faith in something. Either a religious believer, an agnostic, or an atheist, all put their faith in something. Sure, no one really knows what happens after death, it really is a matter of faith. But I'll take my chances this way. There's no other way for me to live.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Three Reasons Why I'm Planning on Working for Mitt Romney's 2008 Presidential Campaign (at least for now)

1) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K-S9Ntek9QE

2) Two Unexpected But Great Wins.

3) http://www3.whdh.com/news/articles/local/BO27303/

Mr. Romney appears to have what the rest of the early candidates don't seem to: moral clarity, courage, and the ability and desire to call things for what they really are. I know his social conservative track record hasn't always been consistent, but he is clear on his principles (including the rule of law) and more importantly willing to act on them, even when they are unpopular, especially with the liberal media. He is a former or soon-to-be-former governor and has experience leading in this arena. There may be other things about him that I don't know yet; these will undoubtedly be made public during the campaign. But unless I see something better forthcoming, he is my man.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Life as I Know It

I love life. I'm sitting in my bedroom watching the original Bad News Bears while catching up on some news and my favorite conservative blogs. It's one of my favorite movies, and Walter Matthau is great in it. I love how he makes changes in his life to ensure he's giving the boys he's coaching the best he can give them. It's inspirational in it's own way, though I'm sure many don't see it that way. My lovely wife is sitting next to me. My oldest daughter Mallory is asleep in our bed. My boys are off having air gun wars in the snow. My youngest daughter Reagan is watching TV in her room. We're just back from the Christmas vacation. It's pretty good.

I often ponder my good fortune. Though not wealthy in the material sense, I couldn't be wealthier in the things that matter most to me - my family and friends. I am a very lucky man. One of the things I feel fortunate about is to have been born in this country. There is no greater country on the face of the earth, nor has there been (I'm sure many, man historians and many liberals think otherwise).

There are many reasons why I think America is great. It remains the one place in the world where any citizen, born into any circumstances, can achieve anything. Anything, if they're willing to work for it. Our history is replete with examples of people who have done so, though I'm too lazy to research them for this post.  Of course, nothing is ever guaranteed, and this is where well-intentioned, if ill-informed, people think government should step in. One school of thought that I struggle with is the notion that government should somehow be expected to guarantee our happiness, our well-being, and to make sure that we have everything we want and not have to work for it. I think the less government the better, and we're headed the opposite direction. Government is growing and growing and is becoming more and more intrusive in our lives. And I don't mean the Patriot Act. I mean laws that take away more and more of our decision making, and I don't like it, and I don't think it's going to get any better with the Democrats in control of Congress. On the other hand, it wasn't like the Republicans exactly shrunk the government and all of its spending. If they can't or won't, then I certainly don't expect the Democrats to.

I'll write more on that soon. I guess the point of this post is to marvel at the greatness of our nation and the kind of lives it affords us the opportunity to live. As far as I'm concerned, there's no better place to be.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

I Have A New Wireless Router

Though I have tried to somewhat keep up with trends in technology, I am late in many ways with knowledge and application of technology, especially when it comes to personal devices. My kids, of course, are immediately handy with the stuff. Like with their cell phones - they can immediately take advantage of every feature the phone offers, while I still don't know how to use my speakerphone. And I have to read the manual to figure this stuff out, while they seem to instinctively know how to use it. Oh well.

As all of my two readers can tell, I haven't blogged since late August. One of the problems is that my job is very busy, I have four teenage kids who are all active, and I like to spend time with my wife. All the activity makes it hard to blog on a consistent basis, especially because to do so would require me to be in our family office, while my wife would be in some other part of the house. So I finally caught up with the 90's and bought a wireless router. We also bought a new loveseat for our master bedroom, in which I am comfortably ensconced even as I write. My wife is sitting next to me reading a magazine, and the TV is on ESPN. Am I a lucky guy or what?

So this will enable me to blog on a much more frequent basis, which will bring much relief to the many fans of my writing.

But it's late on a Friday night after a long and fun week, so this will be all for tonight. I'll write more tomorrow. Although writing intelligently (or at least intelligence as I understand it) can be hard work, I enjoy the mental exercise immensely. And besides, it is so cool to write something, have it psedo-published, and available for the world to read. Even if only two of its six billion inhabitants ever do.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

I'm Surprised We've Made It This Far

I have four wonderful children: Mallory (17), Zach (16), Reagan (13), and Blake (15).

Of course I’m biased, but they are all wonderful, respectful kids with great hearts and wonderful outlooks on life. They are fearfully and wonderfully made, and they are all blessings from the Lord that I really don’t deserve. My wife Lisa does, but I don’t.

Though all have had their share of accidents, Blake seems to be the one most prone to hurting himself. His soccer coach immediately named him “Crash” because of his style of play. He loves skating, and his arms and legs are frequently covered with bruises, scrapes, and cuts. At a rainy out door Little League baseball cookout, Blake was swinging on his elbows between two picnic tables in a pavilion with a concrete floor. There isn’t much give in those kinds of floors. There was a lot of humidity in the air, and things were slippery. I saw him swinging out of the corner of my eye, while talking to someone. While I didn’t think that was the best idea in the world, I figured he knew what he was doing and didn’t go over to say anything to him. As he gained momentum, sure enough, up his legs went, and out his arms went, and down his head went. He hit the concrete with the back of his head. Hard. Off to the emergency room we went. He went to an ice skating party, and we had to take him to the emergency room with two very loose and damaged front teeth, and a cut lip requiring stitches. You see the pattern here. He has applied for an emergency room frequent-flyer card. At his 13th birthday party, someone was saying nice things about Blake and what a wonderful kid he is. My response was something to the effect of “thanks, but hey we’re just glad he’s made it this far.”

As I see frequent news reports of studies that shows health related issues, or see a pharmaceutical company (I’m normally a fan of their work) showing a commercial about another potential disease that sends people running to their doctor in fear, or hear of this potential health problem or that one, I often lament to my wife that with all the potential and seemingly serious everyday threats to our health, I’m surprised the human race has made it this far. The last time I checked, our population was still rapidly expanding, so much so that overpopulation advocates are already raising alarms that at current trends we will render the world unable to support its human population.  So here is a recent example of what I’m talking about.

Over at Scientific American.com, there’s an article discussing the dangers to one’s health of being overweight. Don’t we already know that? Wouldn’t a reasonably intelligent person understand that obesity is inherently unhealthy the same way one would presume smoking would be? This article states that it’s unhealthier for women to be even a few pounds overweight rather than men. But the line I found most disturbing was this: “…the federally funded National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey did not find in a 2005 study that being a little overweight or underweight increased health risks (italics mine).” We need federal money to pay for a survey to tell us that? Who decided we needed that? To what purpose? More nanny-state public service ads advising us to eat right? Legislation prohibiting obesity? Maybe such legislation would allow people to trade obesity “credits” like they’re trying to do in CA with industrial emissions in an effort to reduce global warming, which isn’t even proven to be caused my manmade sources. One person could choose to be overweight as long as they paid somebody else to be under or normal weight.

And here’s the closing paragraph:

"This finding is a sobering reminder that because obesity is now a worldwide problem (with the exception, I presume, of poverty and famine affected third world countries, which are seeing the most population growth – auth.), the phenomenon of 'global fattening' will contribute to a pandemic of chronic diseases for many years to come," said Timothy Byers of the University of Colorado School of Medicine, in a journal commentary.

This is hysterical codespeak for “you better give me more of your tax dollars so I can study this problem further, determine that the problem still exists, and ask for even more of your money, thereby sustaining myself to the lifestyle to which I’ve grown accustomed, while staying away from that dreadful and nasty private marketplace where I might have to compete for my living.” Please.

So here we have the federal government, using your tax dollars and mine, to study something anyone with common sense would already know. It just drives me nuts. Maybe I should call my congresswoman to ask her to sponsor a study to see how federal wastage on studies like this affects people like me. It would probably prove just as useful, which is to say not at all.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Israel Drops to 5 - 1

One of my favorite all time movies is Stripes, that great comedy featuring Bill Murray, Harold Ramis, John Candy, and other very funny people. It’s a movie most guys wish they could have starred in. I’m not sure how many times I’ve watched it, and I can quote many of its lines. It is a classic guy movie, and should somehow be introduced in a debate over Man Laws in one of those great Miller Lite commercials.

One of my favorite scenes in the movie (and I know I’m butchering this) is after the platoon has lost its leader, Sgt. Hulka (wonderfully played by the late Warren Oates), and is trying to prepare for the graduation parade the next day. Led by Bill Murray and Harold Ramis, the effort soon falls into chaos, disarray, and fighting (initiated by Harold Ramis’ great line: “Black guys, help the white guys!” when the group was having trouble getting its rhythm together). Bill Murray, in an effort to rally the discouraged group, says something to the effect of: “We’re the United States Army! We’re 10 and 1!” (I would presume that Vietnam War veterans and families who lost loved ones there probably don’t find that very funny, but that’s another story for another day.) It’s a very funny line, if a bit rueful in its essence.

But that’s what comes to mind when I think of Israel’s recent agreement to the UN sponsored cease fire in its war with Hezbollah. After compiling a spotless record as a sovereign nation at war, they have now dropped to 5 – 1.  I was very disappointed in the Bush Administration’s role in pressuring Israel to accept the cease fire, in essence accepting defeat (which the US would never allow other countries to determine for itself) which is against its own best interests. Here’s what Israel gets: nothing. Zero. Nada. Nothing whatsoever. They didn’t even get their two soldiers back, only a promise to negotiate for them, which means swapping Palestinian prisoners known to be hostile to Israel. Although they did significant damage to Hezbollah’s ability to wage war (or terror, which is a better word for firing rockets loaded with ball bearings to indiscriminate cities full of innocent people), Israel didn’t even secure a commitment from the world (led by the inept and useless UN) to disarm Hezbollah. So now Hezbollah will be free to re-arm itself, replenish its supplies, and upgrade their weaponry. They will strike again when they’re ready, and no international force in southern Lebanon is going to stop them. In fact, any force in place will be complicit with Hezbollah’s re-arming as it will happen under their watch. It was a total loss militarily, and of face in the Arab world, for the Israelis.

Hezbollah won with the assistance of an increasingly anti-Semitic world, and a world with an ever-expanding loss of moral clarity, and a world strangely tilted towards appeasement to the terrorist Arab world (Iran, Syria, Hamas). The world was handed a golden opportunity to inflict a significant defeat to Hezbollah and to its two terrorist-sponsoring states, Syria and Iran. Even other major Arab states such as Saudi Arabia, Egypt and Jordan, who have long learned to co-exist with Israel, sat this one out and condemned the actions of Hezbollah. The world (and the US and Britain in particular) should have let the IDF do its job and destroy Hezbollah in southern Lebanon. Given Israel’s track record in war, if they had been allowed to finish the job, Syria and Iran would have to think carefully about attempting something like that again. Now, because they know the UN and other nations will always stand against Israel, they will become bolder and bolder.

We will see this happen again sooner rather than later. Iran is dangerously close to acquiring nukes, and no one is doing anything about it. Why does the world continue to make the mistakes of appeasement? What good is history if nothing is ever learned from it?*

*In the interest of full disclosure, I’m quoting someone else here in that last sentence; I just don’t know who and I couldn’t find it.

 

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

I've Been Busy, and Leave the Minimum Wage Alone

Well I started this blog as a self-expression on the issues of the day and what have you. I haven’t posted anything since the day after I started the blog. Not exactly a great track record of staying current with current events. And no one seems to be noticing.

But I do have a fan of sorts, and this person’s been bugging me about posting again, and I have to admit I really appreciate the interest. I wasn’t sure once I started whether anyone would really care or not whether I continued it. I knew my family would care, of course, but they haven’t exactly been wearing out the ringer on my cell phone with questions about when I’m going to post again either. But this friend of many, many years (and of many, many experiences which are not fit for posting) is asking, so here goes – for him and for anyone else who may care.

I’m going to link to a couple of articles today on the current debate in Congress on an increase in the federal minimum wage. According to Reuters, the House of Representatives voted 230-180 to raise the $5.15-per-hour minimum wage in three 70-cent steps until it reaches $7.25 in mid-2009. (I have several problems with the article’s incomplete reporting on this, which I don’t have time to go into now – read the whole thing to see for yourself). The article notes that the bill has less of a chance in the Senate, one reason being that Republicans have tied a cut in the estate (death) tax, which Democrats bitterly oppose.

The minimum wage is an emotional issue at best, and is used by liberals and Democrats in Congress (but I repeat myself) as a class-envy and class-warfare tool. Study after study details the harmful affects of the minimum wage. It actually hurts the people it purports to help, and one way it does so is actually to move people up in the earnings brackets, reducing the amount of welfare benefits they may receive and lowering their standard of living. It also hurts small businesses, kills job creation, and forces businesses to pay more than the skill set a person brings to the marketplace is worth. If Democrats were really interested in the little guy, they would focus on ways to generate economic activity (which Bush’s tax cuts have done, which Democrats also oppose and want to repeal).

Over at The Heritage Foundation website, Michael Franc writes in more detail on the subject. Please read the whole thing; it’s fairly illuminating. One of the enduring myths about minimum wage earners is that they are comprised entirely of adults trying to raise children in poverty. He points out several key items that refute this:

“While some minimum-wage workers are primary breadwinners raising young children, the overwhelming majority are either younger workers honing their skills in entry-level positions or part-time, mostly female workers from middle-class homes supplementing their spouse’s income.

  • Only 1.9 million American workers (out of a total workforce of 127.4 million) earn the minimum wage. Most (63%) are women. More than half (53%) are between the ages of 16 and 24, and an even larger percentage (58%) work part-time.
  • Upward mobility is the happy norm. Two out of three of today’s minimum-wage workers will earn 10% more within a year.
  • Many are teenagers who live with their parents in middle-class homes. This explains why the average household income for minimum-wage earners is more than $40,000 a year and why only 19% (about 400,000 nationwide) fall below the poverty line.”


There are families, of course, who do fall into the category or working multiple jobs at minimum wages just to feed and clothe their families. Senator Kennedy of Massachusetts, a class warfare warrior if there ever was one, uses these situations as justification for raising the minimum wage. However, Mr. Franc points out that in the State of Massachusetts,

“The researchers uncovered the dirty little secret of the welfare state. For example, a family of four in Kennedy’s Massachusetts earning $13,000 is eligible for a theoretical maximum package of benefits totaling an additional—hold on to your hats—$31,500, bringing its total income to $44,500.

Specifically, that Massachusetts family could receive $6,500 in cash assistance from TANF, an earned income tax credit worth $4,400, $2,172 in Food Stamps, $275 worth of school lunches, $5,700 in housing vouchers, $6,000 in child-care subsidies and $6,460 in Medicaid. The unintended consequence: As a family increases its earned income, it actually falls further because of the way welfare benefits decline as incomes rise. For example, for each additional $1,000 it earns, the family could lose up to 30% of its Food Stamps and housing voucher.

So what about that minimum-wage earner that Kennedy and his allies want to elevate above poverty?

A family of four with an annual household income of $11,000 (equivalent to what a full-time minimum-wage job yields) could qualify for $33,000 in supplemental welfare benefits. Kennedy’s plan would, assuming no loss of employment, boost that family’s yearly paycheck to $15,000. But, due to the way benefits phase out as incomes rise, that family’s benefit package would decline by $7,000. Thus, total annual income—earned income plus welfare benefits—would actually fall by $3,000. Surely, reducing welfare assistance to half a million working poor families isn’t what the senator from Massachusetts had in mind.”
 

Mr. Franc uses the minimum wage debate to point out all the disincentives for work that our government continues to provide, despite the welfare reforms of 1996. In my mind, however, the minimum wage issue is one of free markets versus government intervention. Once politicians start interfering with free markets, no matter how well intentioned, the results are usually opposite of the intent (Witness the much bally-hooed luxury tax, a class-envy tax levied by Democrats, which ended up hurting blue-collar workers because people stopped buying new luxury items to avoid the punitive tax. Congress quietly repealed the tax a few years later). With the minimum wage, supporters attempt to make a moral argument, stating that it’s a moral imperative that the government set an economic standard, which they’re basically pulling out of thin air. So now you have politicians, no bastion of moral standards themselves, making moral economic standards for which they’ve had little education. Once you have politicians doing that, and people start feeling that they’re victims of free markets instead of participants in them, you begin to slide down a slippery slope of more and more government intervention aimed at creating a social state model. One only needs to look at Europe, and especially France, to see where that leads.

Further, wages are subject to the laws of supply and demand. With the economy keeping a full head of steam, good workers are getting harder and harder to find. If the supply is low, then wages will increase in an effort to attract and retain the best workers. This applies at the entry level position as well. Driving around Albuquerque, there are help-wanted signs everywhere. Many signs also include the starting pay scale, well above the minimum wage. Businesses in a hot economy need workers, and they will pay more to get them if they have to. Otherwise their business will suffer. Businesses have to compete for labor in the same way they have to compete for customers.

My oldest daughter Mallory recently got a job at a restaurant as a hostess. This restaurant also uses hostesses to bus and clean tables. She was paid minimum wage while she was in training, then immediately received a good raise upon completion of training. The restaurant could easily pay minimum wage for the job, but realizes the value and productivity gains of having the hostesses perform double duty, and pays them more to recognize that value. Having the government decide what value an employee is to a business is unnecessary interference that places a drag on the economic engines of this great country. Why would they want to do that?

Although millions have gotten their career start, whether as a teen-ager or adult, at the minimum wage level, no one requires that they stay there. It’s up to individuals to study, work hard, or do whatever they need to do to increase their upward mobility. No one’s going to do it for them.


Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Here's Something You Probably Didn't Know

Today is the 144th anniversary of the creation of the Medal of Honor. At National Review Online,
W. Thomas Smith Jr. writes:

On July 12, 1862 — exactly 144 years ago, today — President Abraham Lincoln signed into law the authorization for some 2,000 “medals,” which were said to be “for non-commissioned officers and privates as shall most distinguish themselves by their gallantry in action.” These were the first official Army “Congressional Medals of Honor.”

The Navy had established a Medal of Honor, several months earlier, for its enlisted sailors and Marines. Over time, both the Army and the Navy awards would be extended to commissioned officers who similarly proved themselves in combat.

Though signed into law in mid-July, the congressionally mandated National Medal of Honor Day is actually March 25 as that was the day in 1863 that the first MOHs were presented to six Union Army soldiers. Less than two weeks later, the first 41 American sailors were awarded MOHs.

The article goes on to describe the actions of different recipients of the MOH, and background into why and how the medal itself is awarded. It's a great article, read the whole thing. It will inspire you.




Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

On Being Diversity Neutral

This is my first official post. I submitted this as an article to National Review Online for their consideration, but I haven't heard from them yet. It's not like this is the only one sent to them. So not knowing when they would respond, I decided to go ahead and post it here. As always, I welcome your comments. Let me know what you think.

Ron

On Being Diversity Neutral

I spent the first nineteen years of my career at a large multinational, multibillion dollar, multi-thousand employee company. In the early years, it was the epitome of a performance-driven company. One could start anywhere and go anywhere based on one’s ability to execute and contribute on behalf of the business. Secretaries became vice presidents. Software developers became Group Executives. It felt wide-open, bare-knuckled, and no-holds barred. The esprit-de-corps was remarkable, and each of us felt that we were part of something unique, special. The only factor determining your success was your willingness to work hard and your ability to succeed. And that was my experience for my first several years at the company. It was an exciting environment, and I loved it.

And then the politically correct forces of the times arrived, and the company caved. Diversity awareness set in. The company began offering classes on diversity to increase employees’ awareness of other ethnicities and their cultures, and sensitivity to same. I had mixed emotions about it at best. And sure enough, shortly after this process began, my low expectations were confirmed. I was speaking to a friend in the company who had attended the diversity class. If he wasn’t aware of the stereotypes of Mexicans before the class, he certainly was now. I can’t say he was better off for it. In the course of discussing the class, his eyes widened slightly, as if really seeing me for the first time: “You’re a Mexican, aren’t you?” Um, yes, at least I was the last time I checked. And I was fairly certain I was a Mexican the last time we had talked, before he had taken the diversity class. I recognized that now my ethnicity mattered, whereas before the only thing that mattered was how I treated people and the results I was able to achieve through my work. That’s what my parents had always taught me. I disliked the change immediately.

For the first time in my career, people began to notice the fact that I was an American of Mexican descent. I always knew I was a Mexican, but never thought about it very much. What difference did it make? So what? Wasn’t I still a human being first? Wasn’t it the content of my character that mattered? Wasn’t it my ability and willingness to work that mattered? Why, then, was I now being at least partially judged by the color of my skin? All of a sudden people I knew were noting that I was, in fact, a Mexican. Many of my more astute colleagues and friends had already recognized this fact, of course, but now I felt somewhat like a novelty instead of a person.

I didn’t ask for it, and I didn’t want it, and I still don’t. It was forced on me. This new “sensitivity” immediately threw everything into question. Now, was I being promoted because I was effective, or partly or only because I was a Mexican? I found it irritating, unnecessary, and insulting. I didn’t need a break, I could compete with anyone. And if someone was a better contributor than me, then that’s the way it was. I didn’t want a “Mexican dividend.” If I was promoted, I wanted it to be based solely on my contributions. Now I felt that whenever I was promoted people would always question whether or not my ethnicity contributed to the decision. Gross.

Then I saw a different aspect of this thinking revealed to me, which I had in no way considered and in fact would not have even occurred to me at the time. I was attending a company-mandated class designed to evolve the nature of the company from a competitive, aggressive posture, to one which operated under a more sensitive, “kinder, gentler” environment. Diversity was a key component of the class. The company was sending all of its leaders to the class, as leadership basically drives the environment of a workplace. At the end of the first day of class, the instructors showed the movie The Color of Fear. It is a very powerful film about the state of race relations in America as seen through the eyes of eight North American men of African, Asian, European, and Latino descent. In a series of emotional and dramatic confrontations the men reveal the pain and scars that racism (or their perception thereof) has caused them. On the flipside, however, the movie could be perceived as six guys of color verbally beating up on one white guy (the other white guy was gay; he seemed to escape the bulk of the assaults), who really had nothing to do with creating the social systems that led to racism. He was just a convenient punching bag. The film, nonetheless, was very powerful.

The following morning the class discussed the film, several of us sharing our personal experience with it. I shared with the group that though I understood and was sympathetic to the perspectives of the Latino men in the film, I didn’t see things the same way they did. I had different ideas. I didn’t want everyone assuming I thought the same way they did simply because I shared the same skin color. If all the white people in the room were getting their first cracks at understanding diversity, then I wanted them to understand that there were diverse thoughts within the same ethnic groups, much as there is vast diversity of thought within whites.

Another person shared, then the next person (whose name I will withhold to protect the guilty) volunteered that she was “ashamed of the company for showing this film with no people of color in the room.” I was, in fact, the only person of color in the room. She caught herself, looked at me, and said, “Well, you don’t count, Ron, because you’re diversity neutral because you espouse white male views.” I was so floored that I didn’t know whether to burst out laughing or whether to publicly humiliate her for the hypocrisy, arrogance, and presumption of her thinking. I just responded that she, nor anyone else, could limit my ethnic diversity simply because I didn’t think the way she expected a Mexican to think.

So there you have it. It was my first exposure to the line of thinking (and this from a white woman, as if she would know how a Mexican should or would think) that one’s race only counts if one possesses a particular ideology. If a person of color has conservative convictions, they won’t be called racist themselves, but they will not really be ethnic because they have adopted conservative American values, such as hard work, independence, self-reliance, and the love of freedom. I find this to be one of the most insidious, arrogant, and presumptuous lines of thinking I’ve ever encountered, and in itself is an insidious form of racism.

At some point in the near future this line of thinking will no longer be viewed as credible (which means that liberals will continue with it for years to come). People of color are being appointed and elected to some of the highest leadership positions in the nation. The hypocrisy of race-card wielding ethnic leaders campaigning against and attacking ethnic conservative leaders, and in fact promoting white leaders running against them, exposes that race no longer matters to them, only ideology. Or, they view only one ideology as being useful to their race. This can only last so long before it collapses under its own weight. Either way, this behavior and line of thinking contributes to the dilution of the power of the race card, something one would think ethnic leaders would want to avoid.

So all this having been said, I think for virtually my entire career my race hasn’t mattered one way or the other. If it has, I’m unaware of it. I’ve never in any form tried to exploit it. The notion that I need help or that I need a spot reserved for me because I’m a Mexican makes me sick. My parents worked hard to give me a better life, as their parents did before them (they emigrated to the U.S. from Mexico). They taught me right from wrong, personal responsibility and accountability, and the fact that I was going to have to earn my way through this life. They never ever suggested that anyone owed me anything, and never did they suggest that I should look to the government for help. So I just go about the business of providing for and raising my family the best I know how. If I wanted to be in a majority population, so to speak, I suppose I could immigrate to Mexico, assuming they’d want me or have me. After all, I wouldn’t be considered diversity neutral there. But all in all, I think I’ll take my chances here.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (3) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Hi and Welcome

My name is Ron Trevino. I am an unabashed fan of America (and all Dallas sports teams), and over recent years have begun to participate in the arena of ideas, especially as they relate to life in America. I also love a good philosphical debate, which I suppose can be construed as redundant to participating in the arena of ideas.

Since I have a voice, I might as well make it heard to the small number of people who might actually be interested in hearing it. I think blogging is a great thing, and allows for individual expression to be published by anyone who wishes to do so. How cool is that?

Anyway, thanks for stopping by. I don't know that I'm any great writer, and I will do my best to keep my articles and links worth reading. I will also try to pepper them with my sense of humor, but of course, humor is in the ear of the beholder.

Let me know what you think!

Thanks,
Ron
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous1Next »